"No State government entity has the power to allow or deny passage on the highways, byways, nor waterways... transporting his vehicles and personal property for either recreation or business, but by being subject only to local regulation i.e., safety, caution, traffic lights, speed limits, etc. Travel is not a privilege requiring licensing, vehicle registration, or forced insurances."Chicago Coach Co. v. City of Chicago, 337 Ill. 200, 169 N.E. 22.
"The court makes it clear that a license relates to qualifications to engage in profession, business, trade or calling; thus, when merely traveling without compensation or profit, outside of business enterprise or adventure with the corporate state, no license is required of the natural individual traveling for personal business, pleasure and transportation." - Wingfield v. Fielder 2d Ca. 3d 213 (1972)
That is an ontological and metaphysical belief claim. This depends on the ontic status of mind and physicality and the all mind god entity and perhaps a completely indescribable higher god entity. Do they have ontic arbitrariness. Is this free will input simply a brute force primitive existent attribute of consciousness that must be assumed. And what is the being who experiences the content of consciousness, who has identity over time.
Did you even understand what you posted? >an artificial person is a non-human legal entity that is not a single natural person but an organization recognized by law as a fictitious person
This would be if John Doe operated a lawn care business and filed taxed under John Doe LLC. Sovereign citizens have Black person tier understanding of language and how it's used.
I know exactly what I posted - Person in everyday language means one thing, Person in legal terms means another.
>I do not have an ID but my person does
If you don't understand the difference and can't discern what the green text meant, then do some further reading.
"Sovereign Citizen" is an oxy moran - they do not go together. It was thought up some time ago by those who have little understanding of what they know.
>nooooo words don't have explictly defined meanings in law just accept what it says at face value chud!
the courts being self-serving revenue generation machines that routinely contradict established law doesn't negate a valid argument. being right and getting the court to enforce the law correctly are two different problems entirely
There are no judicial courts in America and there has not been since 1789.
Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statutes and codes
(FRC. V. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428, 1 Stat. 138-178)
There have not been any Judges in America since 1789. There have just been Administrators.
(FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v PE 261 US 428 1Stat. 138-178)
expecting a group to be reasonable to you when they started of the interaction by stealing from you, and have continued to do so up to this moment, is folly.
nor will more than 99% of the population. Reality is that taxation is theft, and widespread public ownership of firearms is sufficient to deal with petty crime and deter invading militaries, thus making government obsolete.
Carry on complaining over how shit the world is without ever questioning the state’s role in its evil.
28 U.S. Code § 3002 - Definitions
(10) “Person” includes a natural person (including an individual Indian), a corporation, a partnership, an unincorporated association, a trust, or an estate, or any other public or private entity, including a State or local government or an Indian tribe.
nor will more than 99% of the population. Reality is that taxation is theft, and widespread public ownership of firearms is sufficient to deal with petty crime and deter invading militaries, thus making government obsolete.
Carry on complaining over how shit the world is without ever questioning the state’s role in its evil.
It's kind of funny to watch them rant. Reminds me of college when you'd have that one 60 year old butthole taking a freshman 101 course. They'd always try to drop these knowledge bombs on the class and everyone would just roll their eyes at the old man autism.
"Did you ever notice how many of the other slaves get upset if you try to retain your labor. You are called an extremist, terrorist and sometimes even a freeman. They say that you are anti-government. When the truth of the matter is you just don’t want to be a slave. However, you do not have the right to force others to be free if they want to be a slave that is entirely up to them. If they want to bow down and worship corporations, let them. The United States, Great Britain and the Pope are not the problem. It is the other slaves. We would be free if the want-to-be-slaves were gone."
>in minecraft
why is it always 'you' live in a le tax farm. where do you live moron?
You still don't need a permission slip for any of those if you know who you are.
>leafpost is worthless
shock and awe, that
And the people who say that moronic shit never win in Court
Not rue at all - The court seals the record so you can't see it - Just like the cases the iRS loses.
"No State government entity has the power to allow or deny passage on the highways, byways, nor waterways... transporting his vehicles and personal property for either recreation or business, but by being subject only to local regulation i.e., safety, caution, traffic lights, speed limits, etc. Travel is not a privilege requiring licensing, vehicle registration, or forced insurances."Chicago Coach Co. v. City of Chicago, 337 Ill. 200, 169 N.E. 22.
"The court makes it clear that a license relates to qualifications to engage in profession, business, trade or calling; thus, when merely traveling without compensation or profit, outside of business enterprise or adventure with the corporate state, no license is required of the natural individual traveling for personal business, pleasure and transportation." - Wingfield v. Fielder 2d Ca. 3d 213 (1972)
That is an ontological and metaphysical belief claim. This depends on the ontic status of mind and physicality and the all mind god entity and perhaps a completely indescribable higher god entity. Do they have ontic arbitrariness. Is this free will input simply a brute force primitive existent attribute of consciousness that must be assumed. And what is the being who experiences the content of consciousness, who has identity over time.
I'm sure that will hold up in court
Dude weed lmao
>I do not have an ID but my person does
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/artificial_person
Did you even understand what you posted?
>an artificial person is a non-human legal entity that is not a single natural person but an organization recognized by law as a fictitious person
This would be if John Doe operated a lawn care business and filed taxed under John Doe LLC. Sovereign citizens have Black person tier understanding of language and how it's used.
I know exactly what I posted - Person in everyday language means one thing, Person in legal terms means another.
>I do not have an ID but my person does
If you don't understand the difference and can't discern what the green text meant, then do some further reading.
"Sovereign Citizen" is an oxy moran - they do not go together. It was thought up some time ago by those who have little understanding of what they know.
The fictitious person is what in on your DL and any other .Gov paperwork.
>i sentence you to death but your person a fine
>>I'm travelling, not driving
Commercial vehicles are diving
>nooooo words don't have explictly defined meanings in law just accept what it says at face value chud!
the courts being self-serving revenue generation machines that routinely contradict established law doesn't negate a valid argument. being right and getting the court to enforce the law correctly are two different problems entirely
There are no judicial courts in America and there has not been since 1789.
Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statutes and codes
(FRC. V. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428, 1 Stat. 138-178)
There have not been any Judges in America since 1789. There have just been Administrators.
(FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v PE 261 US 428 1Stat. 138-178)
expecting a group to be reasonable to you when they started of the interaction by stealing from you, and have continued to do so up to this moment, is folly.
they are thieves
rightly said
i love sovereign citizen shit
28 U.S. Code § 3002 - Definitions
(10) “Person” includes a natural person (including an individual Indian), a corporation, a partnership, an unincorporated association, a trust, or an estate, or any other public or private entity, including a State or local government or an Indian tribe.
>Person” includes a natural person (including an individual Indian
>including an individual Indian
lol
these turbo-libertarian "anarcho-capitalists" wouldn't last a fricking day in their mad max dark future utopia
nor will more than 99% of the population. Reality is that taxation is theft, and widespread public ownership of firearms is sufficient to deal with petty crime and deter invading militaries, thus making government obsolete.
Carry on complaining over how shit the world is without ever questioning the state’s role in its evil.
26 U.S. Code § 7701 - Definitions
(1) Person
The term “person” shall be construed to mean and include an individual, a trust, estate, partnership, association, company or corporation.
you can always tell how many boomers started using SighSee by how many people legitimately believe sovereign citizen stuff
It's kind of funny to watch them rant. Reminds me of college when you'd have that one 60 year old butthole taking a freshman 101 course. They'd always try to drop these knowledge bombs on the class and everyone would just roll their eyes at the old man autism.
Ignorance is bliss - Keep getting all those permission slips and paying your slave fee's.
>BANNED VIDEO- Police Stop; Right To Travel Success, No License, Registration, Insurance, Plates.....
"Did you ever notice how many of the other slaves get upset if you try to retain your labor. You are called an extremist, terrorist and sometimes even a freeman. They say that you are anti-government. When the truth of the matter is you just don’t want to be a slave. However, you do not have the right to force others to be free if they want to be a slave that is entirely up to them. If they want to bow down and worship corporations, let them. The United States, Great Britain and the Pope are not the problem. It is the other slaves. We would be free if the want-to-be-slaves were gone."
In Soviet America, illegals get rewarded for ignoring borders