Where is the safest place to live if

If hypothetically WWIII started, and I don’t want to be involved, where would the safest place to live be? Assuming money is not an issue and I would prefer something nice, bonus points if it is not an apartment.

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

Yakub: World's Greatest Dad Shirt $21.68

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

  1. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Wyoming

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      moronic answer. The missile silos in Wyoming would be a primary target if Russia or China decided to perform a preemptive strike.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        It's not like this will happen, so it's a perfect place for schizo's to go live and not hurt anyone

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Anon those are in montana, nebraska, and north/south dakota.

        Wyoming has jack shit

  2. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    edinburgh of the seven seas

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Have fun getting supplies out there if shit really hits the fan

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        They’d obv lose access to fuel & medicine but St Helena & Tristan Da Cunha are self sufficient food-wise. Life would just return to how it was on those islands in 19th century

  3. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    South America unironically.

  4. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    New Zealand.
    A large number of rich people from the US etc have bought houses there specifically for that reason.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      New Zealand is already well known, it's gonna be a target. It's like the "Hamptons" of "safe locations"

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        I was just about to say that. That anon was confident that rich people are buying property there, which implies that this knowledge is already common. Any spiteful superpower with a chip on its shoulder would probably target noo zillun for MAXIMUM DAMAGE.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Why would the elite of country A want to nuke the elite of country B in a war? They don't go to war because they hate each other.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        NZ has almost zero strategic and negligible economic value. It's already extremely unthreatening and does not even allow American nuclear warships to come anywhere near it meaning it wouldn't be used as a military staging ground even if there was some kind of benefit to using it as such (there isn't). The "safest" place to be would be some island with literally nothing on it even more remote than NZ like Pitcairn or something. The safest place with real infrastructure and quality living would most likely be NZ.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Central america would be a good place. The problem is that you have a great risk of getting shot in a robbery. Much riskier than a nuclear threat.
      This

      https://i.imgur.com/f7SxKx1.jpg

      Argentina, in the Andes on the Chilean border. It's the place most protected by nuclear fallout and nuclear wenter, fertile for farming, highly unlikely to get nooked, and cheap to move to. If you aren't going to BOOONK, then I'd look into buying a ranch down there. Not that I think prepping for WW3 is a good idea anyways lmao.

      Just get in before WW2 happens and build a good relationship with the locals.

      That's true. But
      >tfw americans have plans of nuking brazil and argentina in case of total war just to avoid them becoming superpowers due to farming

  5. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >assuming money is not an issue
    Do you want to bug out in a sophisticated bunker, or do you want to revert to a peasant lifestyle?
    Survivalists recommend the Northern Rockies as a region to build your fortified compound deep in the forest.
    If money is truly not an issue and you are willing to give up modern civilization and live like a peasant with the peasants, you would want a place with:
    1) plentiful rainfall
    2) a long growing season
    3) friendly neighbors accustomed to simple living and willing to share their practical knowledge
    4) minimal natural diseases
    I'd recommend the northern Andes tropical highland region. The environs of San Agustin in Huila, Colombia struck me as a great place to go back to the land and disappear. Low population density, friendly people, rich greenery, lots of rain, extremely mild climate, far from the big cities.

  6. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >I don’t want to be involved
    I interpret that in two different ways.

    "I don't want to be attacked by invading forces" = Move to a country that doesn't really fight or make enemies (Canada, Iceland, Switzerland, etc.)

    "I don't want to be forced to join the conflict as a soldier" = Make yourself as unqualified as possible. Gain some weight, identify as trans, feign a disability, exaggerate any minor ailments that you actually do have (if any), get an anti-semitic tattoo on your face, etc.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      ww3 means nuclear exchange. which means the eurasian and american continents will be atomic wastelands. i would get as far as possible away from those places until civilization returns.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >eurasian and american continents will be atomic wastelands.
        I take it Africa will be fine because there's nothing of value there?

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          basically yes. no nukes there so the third world will be spared probably. but it will be a shitshow down there too since no customers to buy all the natural resources.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          >I take it Africa will be fine because there's nothing of value there?
          Except most of the minerals needed for modern technology. If shit actually did hit the fan there would be a nuclear-armed recolonization of large swathes of the continent.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Nukes are less area covering than popular imagination gives. Stay out of cities and combat zones, it will be relatively short. The real adventure will be the billion little wars after the big powers collapse, which will be mostly unpredictable and entirely global.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Canada and Iceland are both NATO member states and both host US military installations. If WWIII breaks out they will almost certainly be involved.

  7. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I would get a boat and frick off here. In fact I am already saving for a boat. No way this shit will continue peacefully in my lifetime

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Aren't there any naval bases in that region? If so, that would probably place you in proximity to conflict. Nothing would be stopping some country from seizing an advantageous island as a base of operations save their targets.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        then you can just frick off to another island. there are thousands of islands in that area, many of them barely habituated

  8. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Argentina, in the Andes on the Chilean border. It's the place most protected by nuclear fallout and nuclear wenter, fertile for farming, highly unlikely to get nooked, and cheap to move to. If you aren't going to BOOONK, then I'd look into buying a ranch down there. Not that I think prepping for WW3 is a good idea anyways lmao.

    Just get in before WW2 happens and build a good relationship with the locals.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Just get in before WW2 happens
      dude you're a bit late for that
      although i have heard that some of the survivors of the losing side ended up there

  9. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Ireland will be even safer than Switzerland

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >pic related is a 4 million euro property

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Probably because of the roof. West side has so much cheap farm houses

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Is that actually true?

        Is Ireland really that dire these days???

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Even if the current housing crisis didn't exist, holiday homes on the west coast are generally as expensive if not morseso than an equivalent house in urban areas.
          There are houses in west Galway (Roundstone) that would be smaller but twice as expensive as my current house in the mid-west.
          West Cork is probably your best bet, just make sure you're within cycling distance of a place with some infrastructure & community.
          All bets are off when the Gulf Stream collapses though.

  10. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    The answer is Australia, strong military, civilized society and major food exporter and will likely be hit by less nukes than the northern hemisphere western nations.

    Southern hemisphere also has a much less intense nuclear winter.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >strong military, civilized society and major food exporter
      you say that as if those weren't reasons for strategic hits.
      The only safe places are irrelevant 3rd world shitholes because no one will spend ammo or manpower on those

  11. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    South America

  12. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Chile, argentina

  13. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    The ISS would be pretty safe
    You could even choose which country you want to land in afterwards!

  14. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    North Canada. Northwest territories, Nunavut.

  15. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    The safest place that would still have decent amenities if shit hit the fan: probably Australia or NZ
    The absolutely safest place anywhere on earth: Probably Tristan da Cunha

  16. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    WWIII won't happen at least not in the foreseeable future. Worst case scenario is that Russia chimps out and nukes Kiev prompting an all out conflict between NATO and Russia. Russia would be completely flattened and the west would be badly damaged by nukes. China would just stay out of it and take over what's left, so your safest bet is to learn mandarin.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      See

      Nukes are less area covering than popular imagination gives. Stay out of cities and combat zones, it will be relatively short. The real adventure will be the billion little wars after the big powers collapse, which will be mostly unpredictable and entirely global.

      After the global empire falls, you will see a frickton of regime change and local wars break out. Probably will start with stupid ethnic grievance shit like the Pakis and Hindus, but with no global cop it eventually tumbles into dissolution of large states and mass piracy/banditry.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *